Started By
Message
re: The Mizzou Bowl Ban HAS to be lifted right?
Posted on 8/23/19 at 12:18 pm to JesusQuintana
Posted on 8/23/19 at 12:18 pm to JesusQuintana
Mizzou: Players involved were gone and tutor was employee so NCAA punished the school.
State: Players involved there and tutor not an employee so NCAA punished the players and hit the school with a few penalties to add on.
It's not as disparate as it looks on the surface. The NCAA did what was within their powers to do in both cases. The circumstances are what led to the penalties (you can't punish players that are no longer there but you can punish the school charged with keeping an eye on them).
Sucks for fans of both schools but it's not a ginormous outrage.
State: Players involved there and tutor not an employee so NCAA punished the players and hit the school with a few penalties to add on.
It's not as disparate as it looks on the surface. The NCAA did what was within their powers to do in both cases. The circumstances are what led to the penalties (you can't punish players that are no longer there but you can punish the school charged with keeping an eye on them).
Sucks for fans of both schools but it's not a ginormous outrage.
1
Posted on 8/23/19 at 12:33 pm to Prof
The tutor was an employee which is why they got a showcause. Employee status doesn’t matter so much as how the school can and does react to the situation.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News