Started By
Message

re: The Mizzou Bowl Ban HAS to be lifted right?

Posted on 8/23/19 at 12:05 pm to
Posted by mouse_cop
The South
Member since Aug 2019
2865 posts
Posted on 8/23/19 at 12:05 pm to
Situations aren't identical, but they're pretty similar. Also, no current Mizzou players were on campus when the rogue tutor was there, whereas Miss St has active players on the roster that were involved in their cheating
Posted by tylerdurden24
Member since Sep 2009
46596 posts
Posted on 8/23/19 at 12:07 pm to
That’s the difference: there is nobody left to punish directly so everyone gets punished for LOIC because it wasn’t found out until later

MSU can at least punish those involved making it an isolated incident
Posted by Tennjed
Member since Jul 2017
316 posts
Posted on 8/24/19 at 2:06 am to
quote:

Situations aren't identical, but they're pretty similar. Also, no current Mizzou players were on campus when the rogue tutor was there, whereas Miss St has active players on the roster that were involved in their cheating


Sounds like they couldn't suspend the Missouri players that committed the infraction (like they did State). So instead they had to hit the school. And add to it the tutor was an employee.

This isn't hard to understand.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter