Started By
Message

re: The double dribble no-call sequence favored Auburn

Posted on 4/7/19 at 8:19 am to
Posted by MrAUTigers
Florida
Member since Sep 2013
28297 posts
Posted on 4/7/19 at 8:19 am to
quote:

Double dribble isn’t the correct call. The correct call is a foul at 4.0. The refs did Auburn a favor.




so many people disagree with you. I have yet to see or hear one person say it was not a double dribble. The former head of officiating said it was a double dribble.

Posted by TigerCruise
Virginia Beach, VA
Member since Oct 2013
11898 posts
Posted on 4/7/19 at 8:21 am to
His point is there was a foul before the double dribble. The double dribble should never have happened. The end.
Posted by xiv
Parody. #AdminsRule
Member since Feb 2004
39508 posts
Posted on 4/7/19 at 8:25 am to
quote:

The former head of officiating said it was a double dribble.

Given that the foul at 4.0 isn’t called, yes it’s a double dribble, yes, but the idea that this sequence cost Auburn the game is absurd. Had the sequence been correctly called, UVA in-bounds the ball at 4.0; the call on the court gave Auburn a better situation than that.
Posted by mrbroker
Sylacauga Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
16575 posts
Posted on 4/7/19 at 8:37 am to
No one is disputing the double dribble DA. The intentional fouled would should have been called therefore the DD never would have happened. Ball should have been an out of bound throw in for VA
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter