Started By
Message

re: September 7, 2019 LSU vs Texas

Posted on 1/2/19 at 3:18 pm to
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37764 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

So are you backing off yall ended up with duke because of "fear"? That is my only point in all of this


I am saying no one in the ACC stepped up to take the game. We have Miami next year. Clemson doesn't want to open with us because its more than likely we see them in the playoffs. I have no idea why any other school wouldn't take that payday because he rest of the conference are basically basketball schools so who cares if you get beat. No one was interested other than Duke.

It sucks but that is how this came about. Battle was the dumbass who took the money grab but got the fans a shitty game.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20509 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

I am saying no one in the ACC stepped up to take the game. We have Miami next year. Clemson doesn't want to open with us because its more than likely we see them in the playoffs. I have no idea why any other school wouldn't take that payday because he rest of the conference are basically basketball schools so who cares if you get beat. No one was interested other than Duke.

It sucks but that is how this came about. Battle was the dumbass who took the money grab but got the fans a shitty game.


Hopefully, the net result is that these neutral site games go away. There's just no atmosphere.
I'm good with "pseudo-neutral" games (LSU vs someone at the Superdome, Wisconsin playing in Green Bay, etc), but those are few and far between.

LSU playing in Austin will be fun. Texas playing in BR will be fun.
Bama castrating Duke in Atlanta will not be fun.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter