Started By
Message

re: September 7, 2019 LSU vs Texas

Posted on 1/2/19 at 3:09 pm to
Posted by 14&Counting
Eugene, OR
Member since Jul 2012
37764 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 3:09 pm to
quote:

Plenty of informed fans shite on your old AD for getting into that contract in the first place not knowing the opponenet


Dude - no one is excited about a neutral site with Duke I assure you. Also as I have pointed out that is one clunker in 19 years and bama has done far better at scheduling OOC games than anyone else in the SEC

B/T/W - The process was identical for the games at AT&T in Dallas only with the PAC12. Bama did the exact same thing under identical terms. Now Byrne was a little smarter about it: there were two Pac12 teams that had an open date for 2021 and one was Southern Cal. We just did AT&T with those guys so it was pretty much a lock that USC would take the game and rematch. We were more careful that we didn't get stuck with a Duke type game again.
This post was edited on 1/2/19 at 3:11 pm
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96197 posts
Posted on 1/2/19 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

B/T/W - The process was identical for the games at AT&T in Dallas only with the PAC12. Bama did the exact same thing under identical terms. Now Byrne was a little smarter about it: there were two Pac12 teams that had an open date for 2021 and one was Southern Cal. We just did AT&T with those guys so it was pretty much a lock that USC would take the game and rematch. We were more careful that we didn't get stuck with a Duke type game again.

So are you backing off yall ended up with duke because of "fear"? That is my only point in all of this


Unfortunate scheduling and timing is how you ended up with duke. Its an anomaly for bama in their OOC scenario
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter