Started By
Message
re: Reports out that Clem players’ “B” sample also positive for PEDs.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 9:54 pm to CivilTiger83
Posted on 12/27/18 at 9:54 pm to CivilTiger83
Dude. It doesn't matter WHEN they took it. It was in their system.
Guilty.
Guilty.
Posted on 12/27/18 at 10:20 pm to Lonnie Utah
quote:
Dude. It doesn't matter WHEN they took it. It was in their system.
Dude you were arguing about half life and saying they had to take it very recently. I said if it's a tiny trace, it could have been taken/exposed months ago.
I am not arguing he is not guilty of having it in his system. I am saying based on past history of no PED use despite being tested over the past several years in the playoff and by Clemson, it is plausible that it was exposure via contamination and not as part of some grand steroid scheme. Exposure via contamination has happened recently with a triathlete.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News