Started By
Message

re: Reports out that Clem players’ “B” sample also positive for PEDs.

Posted on 12/27/18 at 9:54 pm to
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
24127 posts
Posted on 12/27/18 at 9:54 pm to
Dude. It doesn't matter WHEN they took it. It was in their system.

Guilty.
Posted by CivilTiger83
Member since Dec 2017
2525 posts
Posted on 12/27/18 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

Dude. It doesn't matter WHEN they took it. It was in their system. 


Dude you were arguing about half life and saying they had to take it very recently. I said if it's a tiny trace, it could have been taken/exposed months ago.

I am not arguing he is not guilty of having it in his system. I am saying based on past history of no PED use despite being tested over the past several years in the playoff and by Clemson, it is plausible that it was exposure via contamination and not as part of some grand steroid scheme. Exposure via contamination has happened recently with a triathlete.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter