Started By
Message
re: What has Missouri brought to the SEC table?
Posted on 11/19/18 at 9:56 am to the808bass
Posted on 11/19/18 at 9:56 am to the808bass
The 5th (STL) and 8th (KC) largest metro areas in the SEC footprint...I'm sure this can be construed as good or bad, but for sake of TV $, it is good. The lowest % of housing units that are mobile homes by state in the SEC footprint, and the lowest poverty rate among states in SEC footprint...again, not sure if this is good or bad, I mean I guess it's good if you look at the southeast as a whole and include MO, maybe it makes the dumpy, broke, poverty stricken region look a less trashy from a statistical standpoint.
2
Posted on 11/19/18 at 10:00 am to MIZ58
Let's be frank here, not even the BigTen would take you, and the SEC just did it out of charity when every one supposed that the Big 12 was breaking up. You tugged on an old man's heart strings and he let you in. He should have paid closer attention to the Aesop fable of the farmer and the viper.
We regret it now. You can go back to the Big 12.
We regret it now. You can go back to the Big 12.
Posted on 11/19/18 at 10:04 am to MIZ58
Another day another post about Mizzou's "fit" in the SEC. I find it funny most of these posts come from fans of schools that either currently suck, or just lost to Mizzou. Give it a rest you idiots. Every school's revenue is up due to the TV contract, which is due to the addition of Mizzou and the Aggies. I visited Columbia a few years ago when Bama played them. Had a great time, nice campus, nice people.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News