Started By
Message

re: Someone tell me why we shouldn’t offer Mike Leach $4.5m/yr to coach the Rebals?

Posted on 11/15/18 at 8:50 pm to
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68574 posts
Posted on 11/15/18 at 8:50 pm to
quote:

Somewhat OT but college coaches shouldn't earn 4.5m
Considering how much money they generate, they are actually underpaid.
Posted by Blaeke
Member since Dec 2016
1020 posts
Posted on 11/15/18 at 9:27 pm to
I do think they are overpaid when the hiring bar is lowered to "how much do you love Ole Miss", here's 3 million a year.
Posted by Doresrules
Dallas, Tx
Member since Dec 2012
4450 posts
Posted on 11/15/18 at 10:37 pm to
Leach has never coached in the SEC and there is a reason why. He cant recruit. Systems with no talent dont work in this league.

Now to the questions some of you clowns asked.

Who has recruited better to Washington St? Leach has averaged a recruiting class somewhere around 47. Classes of 45, 44, 56, 42, 53, 50, and 58. Bill Doba had classes of 51, 22, 43, and 45. Much better recruiting than Leach ranking wise.

Who wins like Leach at Washington St? Leach is at .546, Doba .508, Price .518, and Ereckson .543. Leach is essentially doing what has been the norm at that school.

Wait they are 9-1 currently... they lost to 5-5 USC. The best win is against a 7-3 Utah team.

Facts. Not opinions.

Leach has finished 1st in his division once. 2008... yeah the year he lost to a Houston Nutt lead Ole Miss.

The guy would suck in this league worst than Luke because he couldn't recruit in this league. The same reason I didnt want Luke. Recruiting wins this league not gimmick schemes.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter