Started By
Message
re: The changing of the Blue-Bloods
Posted on 4/18/18 at 8:54 am to LSU Patrick
Posted on 4/18/18 at 8:54 am to LSU Patrick
quote:
As of now, UGA really does not fit in this group.
I realize that the sole criteria of most on this board is national titles, I don't agree that UGA doesn't belong.
Objectively when you take multiple criteria into account UGA clearly fits. UGA has more wins, a higher win %, and more conference titles than AU, LSU, and UF. I assume you're not arguing that AU, LSU, and UF don't belong on this list (I'm not).
2
Posted on 4/19/18 at 5:21 am to Shawn Spencer
I realize that the sole criteria of most on this board is national titles, I don't agree that UGA doesn't belong.
Objectively when you take multiple criteria into account UGA clearly fits. UGA has more wins, a higher win %, and more conference titles than AU, LSU, and UF. I assume you're not arguing that AU, LSU, and UF don't belong on this list (I'm not).
then I think we should quit using blue-bloods and use better than average football schools.
Objectively when you take multiple criteria into account UGA clearly fits. UGA has more wins, a higher win %, and more conference titles than AU, LSU, and UF. I assume you're not arguing that AU, LSU, and UF don't belong on this list (I'm not).
then I think we should quit using blue-bloods and use better than average football schools.
Posted on 4/19/18 at 7:23 am to Shawn Spencer
quote:
I don't agree that UGA doesn't belong.
This is what makes UGA fans so incorrigible and impossible to be around. Because they believe their own bullshite.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News