Started By
Message
re: The changing of the Blue-Bloods
Posted on 4/18/18 at 8:47 am to Che Boludo
Posted on 4/18/18 at 8:47 am to Che Boludo
quote:
On the cusp (no order, but Nebraska/UT seem the closest to meeting the criteria):
- Nebraska (only because they've recently fallen below the .700 win % threshold)
- UTenn
- Penn St
- UF
- Auburn
- LSU
- UGA
- FSU
- Miami
As of now, UGA really does not fit in this group.
7
Posted on 4/18/18 at 8:51 am to LSU Patrick
quote:
As of now, UGA really does not fit in this group.
Why not?
Posted on 4/18/18 at 8:54 am to LSU Patrick
quote:
As of now, UGA really does not fit in this group.
I realize that the sole criteria of most on this board is national titles, I don't agree that UGA doesn't belong.
Objectively when you take multiple criteria into account UGA clearly fits. UGA has more wins, a higher win %, and more conference titles than AU, LSU, and UF. I assume you're not arguing that AU, LSU, and UF don't belong on this list (I'm not).
Posted on 4/18/18 at 10:15 am to LSU Patrick
quote:From the article I mentioned that used the posted criteria for Blue Bloods. Mind you, it is 2 year old data, so add an SEC Championship and NCG runner up to the resume. I think they clearly belong in second tier. Just a bit short on win%
As of now, UGA really does not fit in this group.
quote:
Georgia: Georgia claims two national titles, a 65% winning percentage and two Heisman Trophy winners. The Bulldogs are third all-time in winning percentage in the SEC, and boast 14 conference titles. But UGA, at least during the Mark Richt era, developed a reputation for not being able to get over the hump. They’re actually somewhat of a sleeping giant, at the moment.
Posted on 4/18/18 at 10:23 am to LSU Patrick
quote:
of now, UGA really does not fit in this group.
Don’t be dumb. Uga has fit into this group for a long time.
Posted on 4/18/18 at 1:03 pm to LSU Patrick
quote:
As of now, UGA really does not fit in this group.
Neither does LSU, UTenn or Auburn, imo. Sorry, but I don't think half of the SEC is a blueblood.
Posted on 4/18/18 at 1:21 pm to LSU Patrick
quote:
As of now, UGA really does not fit in this group.
What?!
quote:
LSU Patrick
Oh, that makes sense. Football started in 2000
Posted on 4/18/18 at 8:33 pm to LSU Patrick
quote:
On the cusp (no order, but Nebraska/UT seem the closest to meeting the criteria):
- Nebraska (only because they've recently fallen below the .700 win % threshold)
- UTenn
- Penn St
- UF - Auburn
- LSU
- UGA
- FSU
- Miami
As of now, UGA really does not fit in this group.
Move them above LSU and they fit.
No one claims Georgia is a Blue Blood, but they are indeed on the short list to become one soon.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News