Started By
Message
re: The changing of the Blue-Bloods
Posted on 4/18/18 at 7:44 am to TideFaninFl
Posted on 4/18/18 at 7:44 am to TideFaninFl
Who do you consider all the blue-bloods?
Posted on 4/18/18 at 5:50 pm to I Bleed Garnet
quote:
Who do you consider all the blue-bloods?
Whatever the criteria, these threads always talk about blue bloods improperly. That's a status that was earned long ago that you can't lose or gain no matter what you do.
Threads like this one should be called Now-bloods and New-bloods. UF, Miami and a few others are every bit as solid and laurel filled as some of the old blue blood programs but they're New Bloods. Clemson is a Now-blood that might well make it to New Blood soon. They could also lose their Now-Blood status rather quickly if they start losing.
Alabama is a good example of this... Alabama is both a Blueblood and a Now-Blood. The blue blood part of them won't change if they lose every game for the next 20 years. The Now-blood status could change quickly. However, it's not possible for them to ever be a New Blood.
This post was edited on 4/18/18 at 5:57 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News