Started By
Message

re: The changing of the Blue-Bloods

Posted on 4/18/18 at 7:44 am to
Posted by I Bleed Garnet
Cullman, AL
Member since Jul 2011
54846 posts
Posted on 4/18/18 at 7:44 am to
Who do you consider all the blue-bloods?


Posted by Prof
Member since Jun 2013
42686 posts
Posted on 4/18/18 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

Who do you consider all the blue-bloods?



Whatever the criteria, these threads always talk about blue bloods improperly. That's a status that was earned long ago that you can't lose or gain no matter what you do.

Threads like this one should be called Now-bloods and New-bloods. UF, Miami and a few others are every bit as solid and laurel filled as some of the old blue blood programs but they're New Bloods. Clemson is a Now-blood that might well make it to New Blood soon. They could also lose their Now-Blood status rather quickly if they start losing.

Alabama is a good example of this... Alabama is both a Blueblood and a Now-Blood. The blue blood part of them won't change if they lose every game for the next 20 years. The Now-blood status could change quickly. However, it's not possible for them to ever be a New Blood.
This post was edited on 4/18/18 at 5:57 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter