re: Official Melting UGA fans thread - Would like to keep track for poster retention analysis

quote:

---

When we rate the melts, are we rating the accuracy of the information of the melt or the quality of the whining in the melt?

---

I think quality of the whining and/or *lack* of validity/accuracy to the commentary. Making a factual statement that the officiating was poor shouldn't override someone calling the Alabama team/program "a fraud" for example. Context is important... supporting evidence of comments in other threads is appreciated for fringe melt cases.