re: SEC! SEC! Chant was a topic of conversation today on Sirius XM

quote:

---

Some of us just don't particularly like the "eye test" being passed off as an objective metric.

---

Look, it's one thing if it's just the "eye test," so to speak. It's another thing entirely if an unranked team drops a giant, pornstar-worthy load all over your face, including in both eyes.

You can't just pretend that shite never happened. You can't pretend like you're Phil Fulmer and claim it was just Krispy Kreme glaze.

quote:

---

Everyone understands it. This isn't some elusive concept that only SEC fans can understand.

Some of us just don't particularly like the "eye test" being passed off as an objective metric.

---

Interesting take given that no less than 3 national shows started their show(s) with segments about how they don't understand it.

I'd say the SEC's performance in the MNC game is the metric used.

quote:

---

Some of us just don't particularly like the "eye test" being passed off as an objective metric.

---

It's perfectly okay when your team benefits, though.

quote:

---

Everyone understands it. This isn't some elusive concept that only SEC fans can understand.

Some of us just don't particularly like the "eye test" being passed off as an objective metric.

---

Well, can you name 4 teams in college football thta had better records than Alabama?

Clemson 12-1 (Lost 24-6 to Alabama)
Oklahoma 12-1 (Lost to Georgia)
Alabama 11-1 (Beat the #1 ranked team, Clemson 24-6)
Wisconsin 12-1
UCF 12-0

Can you honestly say UCF should have been in the playoffs? Not using the eye test that you do not like, yet knowing UCF is not a power 5 program, do you think they picked the wrong 4?