Have you investigated Bama’s schedule? It’s not good, man. Barely better that Whisky’s. After Whisky plays Ohio St in the CONFERENCE CHAMPIONSHIP (Bama didn’t even win their division!), the opponents on bama’s and Whisky’s schedules will have nearly identical records. Your argument sucks, and the fact that it’s even debatable the Wisconsin deserves it more than Bama is really all you need to know.

I’ll give credit where credit is due and say that Bama typically deserves to get in. Not this year. They are a good team. Really good if they execute. But they are not a great team this year. Sorry.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by Tuscaloosa

11x Award Winning SECRant user

Member since Dec 2011

46779 posts

Posted on 11/28/17 at 10:29 am to tenacious

quote:
Have you investigated Bama’s schedule? It’s not good, man. Barely better that Whisky’s. After Whisky plays Ohio St in the CONFERENCE CHAMPIONSHIP (Bama didn’t even win their division!), the opponents on bama’s and Whisky’s schedules will have nearly identical records. Your argument sucks, and the fact that it’s even debatable the Wisconsin deserves it more than Bama is really all you need to know.

My argument is based on stone cold facts, sir.

Bama will have played 4 Top 25 teams. Wisconsin will have only played 2. Even with a loss, our current Strength of record is Top 6 in the country. If Wisconsin loses to OSU, their strength of record will not even be in the Top 10, most likely.

Your entire premise is based around the idea that it is impossible for two of the best teams in the country to come from the same division. We know that is untrue.

You have not remotely successfully defended your argument in this thread.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by bamawriter