Started By
Message

re: 650k wasn't a typo

Posted on 9/11/17 at 3:32 pm to
Posted by peepingcrxxms
Sumrall, MS
Member since Aug 2016
848 posts
Posted on 9/11/17 at 3:32 pm to
Because the NCAA is not just going on someone's word. They have to have evidence other than testimony to support an allegation. They have that in his allegation regarding ole miss and they don't in his allegation regarding MSU. Could they find it on MSU if they wanted to? Yea probably so. They aren't burning that bridge though.
This post was edited on 9/11/17 at 3:32 pm
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 9/11/17 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

Because the NCAA is not just going on someone's word. They have to have evidence other than testimony to support an allegation

You don't think LEO who ended up at state, who you know still gets under the table benefits from the source who gave them to him when he signed couldn't give the ncaa evidence to prove he was paid? And why would they need evidence? Why would a kid snitch on his own school and make it up? They are going to hammer OM on a text message that, while yes, we all know what it means, but never mentions a payment.

quote:

Could they find it on MSU if they wanted to? Yea probably so. They aren't burning that bridge though

This is all we are saying. They just released an article about being guardian of the game and its all bullshite.
This post was edited on 9/11/17 at 3:39 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter