Started By
Message
re: Thoughts on the 3-5 conference schedule (elimination of divisions)
Posted on 9/8/17 at 2:47 pm to NYCAuburn
Posted on 9/8/17 at 2:47 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
The change still mandates round robin formats either way around
Good call. Hadn't seen the full wording, but makes sense.
I'm still intrigued by this quote:
quote:
“We felt like in an era of deregulation, this was an area that could and should be deregulated,” Bowlsby said. “I’m happy we were able to come to a compromise that got us part of the way down that path.”
To me that certainly sounds like there is interest in opening it up beyond what has been done thus far, but maybe not enough support to get it done.
I understand there might be some challenges from a tie breaker scenario, but ultimately, isn't that what the BCS/CFP ranking piece would help to sort out? If there isn't a clear head to head equation, it would seem that CFP ranking would be the next best factor as a "neutral committee" determines those placements.
Posted on 9/8/17 at 3:02 pm to fibonaccisquared
Why can't the SEC create a more fair tie-breaker. To me, polls show more bias than truths (as in WHO can watch every game & HONESTLY say "this team should be ahead of that team"?)
This post was edited on 9/8/17 at 5:35 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News