Started By
Message
re: A&M is worse for the conference in terms of brand recognition than Missouri
Posted on 9/4/17 at 9:03 pm to Errerrerrwere
Posted on 9/4/17 at 9:03 pm to Errerrerrwere
I mean it's whatever, you can claim whatever you want personally.
There are just several old multi page threads here and on the MSB where even LSU fans agree they aren't a blue blood.
There are just several old multi page threads here and on the MSB where even LSU fans agree they aren't a blue blood.
2
Posted on 9/4/17 at 9:06 pm to texag7
quote:
There are just several old multi page threads here and on the MSB where even LSU fans agree they aren't a blue blood.
I'm not saying LSU is blue blood FWIW.
Posted on 9/4/17 at 9:06 pm to texag7
quote:
LSU fans agree they aren't a blue blood.
It's really subjective, man. There are reasons to say we are as there are to say we aren't.
To simply say we are definitely NOT is stupid. I could care less, as I believe we are the top 12 collegiate football team in history.
That makes us a blueblood! Sorry that drives aTm so crazy.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News