Started By
Message

re: Miss State LB Leo Lewis received $21,000 before National Signing Day from 2 SEC schools

Posted on 8/25/17 at 1:00 pm to
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

But they had good reason not too!!! Other than LL admitting he took $11K from MSU - nah, no need to go further into that

Leo saying he took money from the school he ended up at is deemed incredible, but saying he took money from a school under investigation was deemed credible. If you people don't see whats wrong with then you are blinded by bias.
Posted by UncleFestersLegs
Member since Nov 2010
10928 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Leo saying he took money from the school he ended up at is deemed incredible, but saying he took money from a school under investigation was deemed credible.
So do you deem his supposed statements credible or not?
Posted by TonyMontana
Member since Jul 2017
1169 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 1:06 pm to
quote:


Leo saying he took money from the school he ended up at is deemed incredible, but saying he took money from a school under investigation was deemed credible. If you people don't see whats wrong with then you are blinded by bias.


He probably did. The point is, the NCAA is after Ole Miss. They needed him to corroborate some stuff so they came to him. Of course they opened and shut the investigation right away. What else would you expect?

They are not saying he isn't credible. Just that they don't have any corroborating evidence. Because they didn't look for any.

Plus, I've heard our booster and coaches don't text each other with stuff like "Oh Noz! I done paid him $10k and I saw on a message board that he's committing to them dang Bayou Bengalz!!!! Bad invesment! SAD."
This post was edited on 8/25/17 at 1:09 pm
Posted by JustGetItRight
Member since Jan 2012
15715 posts
Posted on 8/25/17 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Leo saying he took money from the school he ended up at is deemed incredible, but saying he took money from a school under investigation was deemed credible. If you people don't see whats wrong with then you are blinded by bias.


God you're dense.

Nobody took Lewis at his word. Page 85 of the NCAA's reply to OM's response to the NOA says

the message clearly shows *redacted* referencing his meeting *redacted* with that day and belief they had arranged terms securing *redacted* commitment to the institution. The message also shows expressing surprise and dismay in reading online that *redacted* was flirting with other schools and he likely had wasted $10,000.

The NCAA is in possession of a message between Barney and a booster that discusses both a meeting and the money.

That's what you call a smoking gun. The NCAA may well believe that Mississippi State paid him too, but absent corroborating evidence they aren't going to make a case about it.

If you're going to be mad and lash out at someone, lash out at your inept leaders and boosters that talk about payouts on electronic platforms that leave a footprint and be extra angry that Mississippi State's bagmen are light years ahead of the ones you've got in Oxford.
This post was edited on 8/25/17 at 1:20 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter