Started By
Message

re: Gary Danielson says Eason wasn't the issue....

Posted on 8/29/17 at 11:07 am to
Posted by RD Dawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
27307 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 11:07 am to
quote:

And even if those 3 glorious games against Louisiana [quote]11 of our 18 rushing TDs were in the first 6 games.
1,294 of our 2,486 rushing yards were in our first 6 games.


Ok,now your moving the yardstick to the 1st 6 games vs the last 6?WTF? My argument has always been the last 3rd including the bowl game.We We were horrible vs UF and we made a discernible change in our run blocking scheme and was reflected in our rushing results the next 5 games.Don't GAS if you don't think there was improvement or not but it was obvious


quote:

Smiling about improvement over our dreadful October is comical.



October??? We were HORRIBLE in 3 outta our 4 games in September or are you still counting Ole Miss as some type outstanding performance? We rushed for 67 yards in the 1st half and 160 after were down 31-0 and scored 2 rushing touchdowns after we were down 45-0 and Ole Miss finished 117 in rushing defense.Nichols St was at best a mediocre non P5 team and we struggled to get a 100 rushing yards vs Missouri who finished 118 in rushing defense.






This post was edited on 8/29/17 at 11:36 am
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
25973 posts
Posted on 8/29/17 at 12:04 pm to
You are cherry picking your definition of improvement.

I'm on record saying that we were dreadful the entire season. We were not better the last 3 games of the season than we were for the entire season. 2016 was what it was. If you want to call it going out on a high note... fine. Our 2 best games were not in the final 3. In my opinion, it was SSDD.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter