Started By
Message
re: Big 12 is screwed
Posted on 6/8/17 at 6:47 pm to WestCoastAg
Posted on 6/8/17 at 6:47 pm to WestCoastAg
Landofthieves, in their conference realignment thread, keeps mentioning a scenario where we take Texas Tech with Texas and OSU with OU. Not sure what makes them think we would take the dead weight of TT and OSU just to get to Texas and OU? I can MAYBE see OSU with OU, but Texas Tech? NO! 
This post was edited on 6/8/17 at 6:56 pm
3
Posted on 6/8/17 at 7:07 pm to LiveGold
quote:
can MAYBE see OSU with OU, but Texas Tech? NO
at TT I get the idea that adding a "small market" school is not desirable, but let's not act like the OSU athletic department is "dead weight"
Both Oklahoma schools have great athletic department profiles. Oklahoma is just a really small state
Posted on 6/8/17 at 7:16 pm to LiveGold
The SEC does not need UT or OU.
If either OU or UT leave the B12 for the B1G/PAC/ACC they will take in less TV revenue.
They would both lose their tier 3 revenue and have to take a partial share for the first couple of years.
As much as I would like a super 64 (16 x 4)... it's not happening. The PAC was too stupid to add the Texoma 4 a few years ago. Now they make less than OU/UT.
If either OU or UT leave the B12 for the B1G/PAC/ACC they will take in less TV revenue.
They would both lose their tier 3 revenue and have to take a partial share for the first couple of years.
As much as I would like a super 64 (16 x 4)... it's not happening. The PAC was too stupid to add the Texoma 4 a few years ago. Now they make less than OU/UT.
This post was edited on 6/8/17 at 7:24 pm
Posted on 6/8/17 at 8:17 pm to LiveGold
quote:
Not sure what makes them think we would take the dead weight of TT and OSU just to get to Texas and OU?
I dunno.....maybe because you took the dead weight of ATM and Mizzou. Call me crazy.....
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News