Started By
Message

re: Someone give the cliffs. Is ole miss better off or worse than 24 hours ago

Posted on 6/6/17 at 8:17 pm to
Posted by SouthOfHere
Pascagoula, Ms
Member since Feb 2013
1921 posts
Posted on 6/6/17 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

quote:
So the Boosters who are fighting to keep their names redacted and keep the NOA sealed are planning to sue the NCAA, and allow the whole thing to go public? The NCAA didn't disassociate the Boosters, Ole Miss did.


Basically the boosters would be pissed that they are being drug through the mud based on LL's testimony. Based on the response to the NOA, it is shaky AT BEST and there is a really good chance it wouldn't hold up in court.

So basically they would take it to court, get that testimony thrown out and then say, what do you have now NCAA? Which it looks like they don't have anything else.

Not to mention 90% of the amended NOA is based off of LL's testimony. So if most if it gets thrown out, expect what we self imposed plus another slap on the wrist because there is nothing else there. (It would be like the draft night and everything that came after never happened.)




Except the LL testimony is Rock Solid. They are blowing smoke straight up your bung hole. They are hoping against hope. The mountain of corroborated evidence to back LL is ASTOUNDING! That response should scare the shite out of OM fans. You need to talk to impartial lawyers. Not OM scrub attorneys. People with nothing in the pot. They can tell you how bad it is.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter