Started By
Message

re: Fire Bret Halter

Posted on 5/15/17 at 2:59 pm to
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111719 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 2:59 pm to
I actually prefer we spend zero dollars on track. So if the new coach cost more than zero dollars, I'm opposed.
Posted by mizslu314
Dirty STL
Member since Sep 2013
15987 posts
Posted on 5/15/17 at 2:59 pm to
quote:

I actually prefer we spend zero dollars on track. So if the new coach cost more than zero dollars, I'm opposed.


Count me in
Posted by Literalist
Minnesota
Member since Oct 2014
3484 posts
Posted on 5/16/17 at 10:31 am to
quote:

I actually prefer we spend zero dollars on track. So if the new coach cost more than zero dollars, I'm opposed.


Well, since "zero dollars" ain't gonna happen...and changing coaches wouldn't increase cost...I'd prefer a winning non-rev program rather than the chronically sub-par one we have.

But, being charitable, I'll let you cut all funding for Cross Country.

ETA: And soccer. You can whack soccer. And maybe Diving/swim. But Cross Country and soccer, for sure.
This post was edited on 5/16/17 at 10:35 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter