Started By
Message

re: E. Holyfield Arrested

Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:24 am to
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
59014 posts
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:24 am to
quote:

If marijuana laws didn't exist or were not enforced, a lot of law enforcement and prison staff literally would not have enough to do.


That's an interesting thought process, and you might be right. However, I came across this:
Traffic fatalities double since marijuana legalized in Colorado

Now, after I found this, I did some digging, and I found that a large number of people who tested positive for marijuana in their system after a fatal accident also tested positive for alcohol. the question, would be then...was it the alcohol or the marijuana that caused the accident...or neither? It's nearly impossible to say definitively, however, alcohol was legalized long before marijuana was, and if the numbers almost doubled, then it is reasonable to draw a conclusion that marijuana was responsible for at least a large portion of the statistic.

Ask any cop if he would rather ding a kid for marijuana or work a fatality and I think we know what he would say.

I know this is a subject that we could go on about for days or weeks and not get anywhere....and whether marijuana should be legalized or not is not what this thread is about. I shouldn't have gotten involved, as it will just spill over into posts concerning football. people can't/won't separate my views about marijuana with my views on football. It was dumb of me to speak up, as no good will come of it.



This post was edited on 5/3/17 at 9:25 am
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
25901 posts
Posted on 5/3/17 at 9:32 am to
quote:

Now, after I found this, I did some digging, and I found that a large number of people who tested positive for marijuana in their system after a fatal accident also tested positive for alcohol. the question, would be then...was it the alcohol or the marijuana that caused the accident...or neither? It's nearly impossible to say definitively, however, alcohol was legalized long before marijuana was, and if the numbers almost doubled, then it is reasonable to draw a conclusion that marijuana was responsible for at least a large portion of the statistic.

No one's talking about making it legal to smoke weed and drive. We're talking about a kid being pulled out of his dorm room in the middle of the night.
Posted by Whiznot
Albany, GA
Member since Oct 2013
7023 posts
Posted on 5/5/17 at 10:59 am to
Information released by governments tends to show that cannabis adversely affects drivers. Governments lie.

For decades Australia has blood tested all drivers involved in driving accidents that resulted in injury. The database of driver blood tests was a very large sample for study.

Adelaide University Professor Jack Maclean, director of the road accident research unit, said, while there was no doubt alcohol affected driving adversely, that was not the case with marijuana.

In the accident sample in which one of the drivers had a measurable amount of blood alcohol (not legal limit), the driver with blood alcohol was at fault in 80% of the accidents.

In the accident sample in which one of the driver's blood tested positive for cannabis, the driver with cannabis traces was at fault in 48% of the accidents.

Stoned drivers are paranoid drivers. They tend not to speed and they tend not to take risks. I speak from experience.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter