Started By
Message

re: Is there a QB battle?

Posted on 4/15/17 at 8:29 am to
Posted by Kraven Moorehed
Franklin
Member since Dec 2015
2325 posts
Posted on 4/15/17 at 8:29 am to
The Worley read option was as dumb as it gets. 99 out of 100 times the RB would get the ball, so we were purposely not blocking a Dlineman for no reason. That rare occasion when he did run it would be for a three yard gain at best. What was the point? The linebackers never even hesitated and a lucky DE got to go tee off on a running back.

Butch is retarded, but I like to think that even he could learn from that.
Posted by David Ricky
Hailing From Parts Unknown
Member since Sep 2015
24265 posts
Posted on 4/15/17 at 8:44 am to
Yeah I really cannot recall an instance when the read option worked with Worley or Peterman back there. The only halfway effective running play was the delayed draw to Hurd up the middle.

I think Dobbs finally came in against Alabama and the entire offense changed. I'm pretty sure VOLS were averaging like 200+ rushing the rest of the season when it was a struggle to eclipse 100 against fricking UTC earlier in the year.
Posted by Wishnitwas1998
where TN, MS, and AL meet
Member since Oct 2010
58357 posts
Posted on 4/15/17 at 11:11 am to
quote:

Worley read option was as dumb as it gets. 99 out of 100 times the RB would get the ba


I'm honestly not sure he kept it a single time


Maybe in like a 4th and 1 situation
Posted by vol27
fort oglethorpe
Member since Mar 2015
329 posts
Posted on 4/15/17 at 3:38 pm to
Honestly I have blocked Worley out of my mind till now. But that will end up being a solid comparison.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter