Started By
Message

re: Lunardi's 2017-18 Bracketology

Posted on 4/4/17 at 3:36 pm to
Posted by GenesChin
The Promise Land
Member since Feb 2012
37706 posts
Posted on 4/4/17 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

He gets several Arkansas fans to bite every post


Kind of shocked that my fellow Aubies are being pulled into the boat right now


I don't have a problem with a team with two 5* being in top 25 when they are returning a number of pieces.

Personally, I thought Alabama was easily the most overrated team in the SEC. Outside of USCe sh*tting the bed vs Bama, they did nothing of note. I don't see two 5* being the difference to push them into the top 25 or NCAAT


I don't have an issue with the other teams projected in though
This post was edited on 4/4/17 at 3:38 pm
Posted by SummerOfGeorge
Member since Jul 2013
102699 posts
Posted on 4/4/17 at 3:40 pm to
quote:

Personally, I thought Alabama was easily the most overrated team in the SEC. Outside of USCe sh*tting the bed vs Bama, they did nothing of note. I don't see two 5* being the difference to push them into the top 25 or NCAAT


They finished 56th in KenPom, return most of the roster and add the most electric recruit in the country that fits perfectly into the biggest need.

50. Virginia Tech (NCAAT, 9S)
51. Seton Hall (NCAAT, 9S)
52. Houston
53. USC (NCAAT, 11S)
54. Nevada (NCAAT, 12S)
55. Syracuse
56. ALABAMA
57. Tennessee
58. Princeton (NCAAT, 12S)
59. UNC-W (NCAAT, 12S)
60. Providence (NCAAT, 11S)

Not sure how they were "overrated".

Top 25 next? Yea, probably not. I don't think it's a stretch at all to see them as a 10 or 11 seed.
This post was edited on 4/4/17 at 3:47 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter