I'd call 44%+ elite.
38-44% good, but not knockdown.
35%-37% decent.

And anything below 35% average to below average as you go down.

And I guess my other point has been missed completely. Those that are NBA draft evaluators do not evaluate college prospects on their shooting by their 3 point percentage, they look at free throw percentage. A good free throw percentage to them means that a prospect's stroke is good and their three will eventually translate very well.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by UAtide11

Member since Apr 2014

2190 posts

Posted on 3/26/17 at 11:55 am to SECFan1995

quote:
I'd call 44%+ elite.

There's literally been two guys in NBA history north of 44%. Neither took more than 2.5 per game.

Monk will likely be a good shooter in the NBA. He's got a pure stroke, good release, elevates well. His questions will be defending bigger guys and whether or not he can run an NBA offense as the point.

I think Brad Beal would be a pretty good player comp for him.

This post was edited on 3/26/17 at 12:02 pm

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Arkansasrazorback

Member since May 2010

9288 posts

Posted on 3/26/17 at 12:23 pm to SECFan1995

quote:
I'd call 44%+ elite.
38-44% good, but not knockdown.
35%-37% decent.

quote:
They look at the free throw percentage.

Canyon Barry grannies that shite in at nearly ninety percent. He's not a great shooter by any means.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by Weagle25

THE Football State.

Member since Oct 2011

46217 posts

Posted on 3/26/17 at 1:07 pm to SECFan1995

quote:
I'd call 44%+ elite.

So you think Steve Kerr and Hubert Davis are the only elite shooters in the history of the league.

You also think Curry, Thompson, Ray Allen, Reggie Miller are good but not knockdown.

0 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board