Started By
Message
re: Random thought: JR Smith and Malik Monk
Posted on 3/26/17 at 9:58 am to Weagle25
Posted on 3/26/17 at 9:58 am to Weagle25
Being below 40% doesn't mean one is "terrible," but the elite shooters are typically above that mark. JR Smith is shooting slightly below the mark, and so is Malik Monk. The difference is obvious.
I never thought saying Malik Monk isn't an elite shooter would draw this much attention. He isn't
I never thought saying Malik Monk isn't an elite shooter would draw this much attention. He isn't
1
Posted on 3/26/17 at 10:05 am to Arkansasrazorback
Nice pivot. Let's get back to what you originally said.
JR Smith - 37%
Monk - 39.5%
So we can round 37 up to 40 but we can't round 39.5 up to 40? You don't think Monk is capable of hitting two more threes than he did? Because that would put him at 40.
quote:
JR and Malik are not even remotely similar. Malik shoots an extremely low percentage from three
JR Smith - 37%
Monk - 39.5%
quote:
JR shoots 40+% from three. Malik is not capable of that from the college line.
So we can round 37 up to 40 but we can't round 39.5 up to 40? You don't think Monk is capable of hitting two more threes than he did? Because that would put him at 40.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News