Started By
Message
re: Mizzou media
Posted on 3/5/17 at 7:39 pm to JesusQuintana
Posted on 3/5/17 at 7:39 pm to JesusQuintana
They like him because he is a nice guy. The only reason there is pushback is because he is a nice guy. If he was an arsehole to the media people, they would be saying something to the effect of "good riddance". They simply aren't looking at his job performance.
If they were, they would see three 20+ loss seasons....something that had happened TWICE in the entire existence of the program prior. They would see, WORST record in program history. But they aren't.
They see a guy who will give them what they want in terms of access and being nice.
If they were, they would see three 20+ loss seasons....something that had happened TWICE in the entire existence of the program prior. They would see, WORST record in program history. But they aren't.
They see a guy who will give them what they want in terms of access and being nice.
1
Posted on 3/5/17 at 7:55 pm to 5thTiger
because college writers are biased based on how much access a coach gives them and he gave them a lot.
he can call people bad all he wants while he plays pretend journalist when his job is just to read tweets and tweet at kids and then sell the "info" they give him.
he can call people bad all he wants while he plays pretend journalist when his job is just to read tweets and tweet at kids and then sell the "info" they give him.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News