Started By
Message
re: Hypothetical for you guys
Posted on 2/24/17 at 12:58 pm to NIH
Posted on 2/24/17 at 12:58 pm to NIH
Been pondering this one a bit. I'm leaning towards "no" based on seeing a lot of the top talent leave the state last year, but we've had previous years where I think we could have landed almost all of them if OM was out of the picture. On a multi-year timescale I think you have to assume it works in our favor, actually.
I wonder how big of a boon having a competitive in-state rivalry is for keeping the fence up around MS? If OM does get nuked into irrelevance for a long enough period, do recruits start filtering out of the state at a higher rate? Does this happen if we manage to achieve and sustain some success over the next 2-3 years? All possibilities.
I don't think any kind of advantage is just gonna fall in our laps. Mullen will have to work at it, but the opportunity will be there.
I wonder how big of a boon having a competitive in-state rivalry is for keeping the fence up around MS? If OM does get nuked into irrelevance for a long enough period, do recruits start filtering out of the state at a higher rate? Does this happen if we manage to achieve and sustain some success over the next 2-3 years? All possibilities.
I don't think any kind of advantage is just gonna fall in our laps. Mullen will have to work at it, but the opportunity will be there.
Posted on 2/24/17 at 1:01 pm to weedGOKU666
Well said. I think if Mullen can even pick up 3-5 guys a year who he wouldn't ordinarily get that it's a huge win.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News