Started By
Message

re: Coaching rumor

Posted on 2/5/17 at 6:52 am to
Posted by slayerxing
Gainesville
Member since Feb 2010
11045 posts
Posted on 2/5/17 at 6:52 am to
You need both. Isn't that obvious?
Posted by gatordmb89
Member since Dec 2009
30461 posts
Posted on 2/5/17 at 1:50 pm to
Think Slayer and I have the same outlook. Not complaining about either hire, just don't know much about them at this point. Hoping for the best.
Posted by StrawsDrawnAtRandom
Member since Sep 2013
21146 posts
Posted on 2/5/17 at 1:59 pm to
McElwain could walk on water and still have people complain he doesn't know how to swim.

He can't just force people to come to Florida, and the entire year I listened to people bitch about recruiting -- we land a strong recruiter ''but he better know how to coach. ''

I'd think it'd be obvious we were doing that.
Posted by montanagator
Member since Jun 2015
16957 posts
Posted on 2/10/17 at 2:53 pm to
quote:

You need both. Isn't that obvious?



Right, this is such a false dichotomy-- it comes up all the time on Florida boards too-- "You don't like Mac's recruiting would you prefer Boom or Zook, they brought in the stars"

That's not the only option, you can-- and title winning coaches do-- regularly bring Top 5 classes and still have good play calling and instruction.

Speaking of people who struggle at both play calling and recruiting-- why can't we just offer Co-OC to guys like Cristobal and Locksley, its not like Nuss is a Spurrier or even Mullen play caller what exactly would the loss be-- "oh no, now Nuss can't go for a 4th consecutive offense outside the top 100"
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter