those are not alternative facts. Those are a very narrow selection of additional facts. If you want Trump level alternative facts you are going to have to invent some final fours at the very least. We have a better history. all the other things are also true. It's still basically a lateral move.

And it's extremely debatable. If you took it off this board to the rant (which would be interesting) it would go more for than against. And it would blow up. Needs to be done.

This post was edited on 1/26/17 at 6:39 pm

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by wubilli

Columbia

Member since Apr 2014

5517 posts

Posted on 1/26/17 at 3:19 pm to MIZ_COU

Fans have short memories. 5 years ago Mizzou ended the season ranked in the top 10 nationally, had its 4th straight NCAA appearance.
Spent a good portion of the next season ranked, before injuries and Dixons dismissal. Still made the NCAA tournament.

Yet somehow the Mizzou job is now considered a bad job. A good hire and it will be back in the top 3-4 in the SEC.

A good hire means committing money not just to the head coach. Also to the assistants as well as recruiting.

Also means Sterk fixing the compliance office.

2 ...

Report Post

Posted by sofa

CoMo

Member since Nov 2013

631 posts

Posted on 1/26/17 at 3:48 pm to MIZ_COU

You said there's not much difference between the two in winning percentage since 2000.

That's wrong. How you can ignore that is beyond me.

Plus, Mizzou has had way more NCAA tournament visits in that time. Despite the flood of arse-piss this program has been overthe last 3 years, Mizzou has been better in almost every category in that span.

0 ...

Report Post

Mizzou Sports Board - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board