quote:
again your only basis for CU losing more in SEC is you are a SEc homer. i doubt you have any knowledge of rosters in the ACC on a year to year basis. probably the only time you see ACC teams play is when they go against a SEC team.

We do know that until this season Dabo led Clemson teams have never been better than .500 against the SEC in any given season. Using that math we can assume (like you have suggested with wins over Auburn, Bama and USCe this year) Clemson would have been 4-4 in SEC play those years. Normally that means 8-5 or 9-4. I agree with your assumption about 2016, I believe it is likely if Clemson had an SEC schedule they would have won the SEC this year.

quote:
that last play into the endzone

Thanks for proving my point. Auburn was throwing into the end zone.

This post was edited on 1/18/17 at 4:37 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Tillman

Member since May 2016

12363 posts

Posted on 1/18/17 at 4:50 pm to Tigerman97

quote:
Thanks for proving my point. Auburn was throwing into the end zone.

you sure seem proud of your moral victory. i can' tthink of too many ACC teams that scored 12 or fewer points against Clemson in recent years though, even at Clemson. Pitt had 43 at Clemson. Auburn at 12 at home. lol

Auburn's offense looked pretty awesome against Ole Misa and Ark and other sec schools.

Clemson's offense played like crap and still won on Auburn's field.

looks like gallman beasting on Auburn though, 30 rushes and 123 yards lol. i though CU had struggled to run the ball in that game. the coaches weren't running Watson much at that point to keep him healthy.

CU had 3 turnovers in that one.

Mike Williams had 9 catches for 174 yards and if i recall correctly he dropped one or two other touchdown passes. it looks like clemson wasn't spreading the ball around well , WIlliams had 9 catches, the next two only had 3 each.

This post was edited on 1/18/17 at 4:59 pm

3 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board