Yes, the SEC has gone downhill in the last few years and will continue to do so. You can't maintain 3-5 title contenders year in and year out (which we used to have) when one team is winning all the conference titles. Look how shitty the Big Ten was when Ohio State was winning it every year. Look how shitty the Big XII is with Oklahoma winning it almost every year. Look how shitty the Pac 12 was when USC was winning it every year. Look how shitty the ACC was in the '90s when Florida State was winning it every year. Look how shitty the SEC was in the '70s when Alabama was winning it every year.

The SEC had its strongest run during a period when no team repeated as SEC champions from 1999 through 2014. When we had Florida, Alabama, LSU, Georgia and Auburn all taking turns winning the conference title, the SEC was unquestionably the strongest conference in college football. To maintain powerhouse status, you have to win titles at least some of the time. When only one team is doing that, there is only going to be one powerhouse.

This post was edited on 12/29/16 at 10:05 am

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by elit4ce05

Member since Jun 2011

3743 posts

Posted on 12/29/16 at 1:22 pm to Nuts4LSU

quote:
When only one team is doing that, there is only going to be one powerhouse.

what in the holy frick does how good Bama is have anything to do with how bad your team sucks? If that was the case at all, wouldn't you only have 1 loss and still be a powerhouse? Damn you L6U fans will find some way to blame Bama.

"The SEC sucks arse because Bama is too good."
See how stupid that sounds.