Started By
Message

re: Edited: Cam Akers is now #1 RB (#3 overall)

Posted on 12/7/16 at 3:13 pm to
Posted by stoms
Coastal
Member since May 2012
1729 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

You've beaten LSU twice in 25 years. Cam being there or not being there doesnt change that. Yall care about beating one school, so yes, Bama fans or other schools may have that logically viewpoint, but you guys dont.


So because I'm a MSU grad, I can't have a logical viewpoint because we've beaten LSU twice in 25 years? Got it. But if I'm a Bama fan with the same viewpoint, it's acceptable. That makes no sense whatsoever and has nothing to do with Cam's recruitment.

And again, I don't share the same pov as Skirp. I'm just saying it's logical. My opinion: I don't want Cam Akers at Ole Miss because they are our rival.

Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 12/7/16 at 7:43 pm to
Lsu is more of a threat to Bama's dominance than Om is. OM's success is more of a threat to MSU's program than LSU's success. How is Cam at OM instead of LSU better for MSU logical?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter