Started By
Message

re: Reality

Posted on 10/31/16 at 10:52 am to
Posted by djsdawg
Member since Apr 2015
33143 posts
Posted on 10/31/16 at 10:52 am to
quote:

change the narrative but that's your MO and I who argued that we didn't play an easy schedule in '15?We obvoiusly did.BTW '16 will probably end up as easier. But so are you saying now that you didn't say this the "worse roster since the mid 90's" or this was the "worse roster of the 2000's"?


This schedule is gonna have to get much easier to get close to 55th toughest.

I know I said that about our schedule, but I can't confirm if I said that about our roster, but it's not far off from the truth either way.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58984 posts
Posted on 10/31/16 at 10:58 am to
quote:

This schedule is gonna have to get much easier to get close to 55th toughest.



Auburn, GT and Kentucky seem to be better than they were last year. Kentucky actually looks legit at times. South Carolina looks improved.

Vanderbilt is worse, Ole Miss is MUCH worse than Alabama last year, Nicholls is awful, North Carolina is not as good as their record indicates and Missouri is much worse.

It will be interesting to see where the SOS shakes out at the end of the year. Kentucky should lose at least two more games.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58984 posts
Posted on 10/31/16 at 11:02 am to
quote:

This schedule is gonna have to get much easier to get close to 55th toughest.



Am I looking at this wrong? This link is showing us (at the end of the year) at 33rd last year.

LINK
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter