Started By
Message
re: Bama/UT Sig Bet
Posted on 10/14/16 at 10:43 pm to WhiskeyPapa
Posted on 10/14/16 at 10:43 pm to WhiskeyPapa
Surely this sig bet is weighted 70-30 Bammer?
Bammer should win. None of the people who post here will have an effect on the outcome.
So the Bammers are hardly showing a lot of stones by taking the bet.
Then they show themselves as immature dicks by trying to bait the Tennessee fans into taking the bet. The Vol fans take the bet to show they believe, not that the Vols will or can win, but just to show their loyalty to the Volunteers.
The point is -- if these teams were evenly matched or if a person were canny enough to say -- this advantage will overbear the other team's advantage -- that is make a judgement much as in War where factors of time, distance, morale, supply, and many intangibles had to be weighed against the chance of success - Only THEN would a "sig bet" be something to pursue.
It doesn't take much nerve to pick Bammer in this game, or any of its games.
And only a mouth breathing bunch of Gumps would miss that point.
Oh wait, it's "just for fun."
You can post here and say anything you want, responsibility free. Got it.
Walt
UT '81
Bammer should win. None of the people who post here will have an effect on the outcome.
So the Bammers are hardly showing a lot of stones by taking the bet.
Then they show themselves as immature dicks by trying to bait the Tennessee fans into taking the bet. The Vol fans take the bet to show they believe, not that the Vols will or can win, but just to show their loyalty to the Volunteers.
The point is -- if these teams were evenly matched or if a person were canny enough to say -- this advantage will overbear the other team's advantage -- that is make a judgement much as in War where factors of time, distance, morale, supply, and many intangibles had to be weighed against the chance of success - Only THEN would a "sig bet" be something to pursue.
It doesn't take much nerve to pick Bammer in this game, or any of its games.
And only a mouth breathing bunch of Gumps would miss that point.
Oh wait, it's "just for fun."
You can post here and say anything you want, responsibility free. Got it.
Walt
UT '81
4
Posted on 10/14/16 at 10:46 pm to WhiskeyPapa
quote:
I'm scared
We can tell Walt. You don't to write a book about it
Posted on 10/14/16 at 10:51 pm to WhiskeyPapa
Why are you so angry?
There are several Vol fans that have talked shite all week and then refused the bet. That's why they were told they have no stones. If you aren't one of them, ignore it.
I have no idea if Bama will win or not. I definitely wouldn't say it was a 70% chance. This game scares me like it does every single year.
It isn't that serious.
There are several Vol fans that have talked shite all week and then refused the bet. That's why they were told they have no stones. If you aren't one of them, ignore it.
I have no idea if Bama will win or not. I definitely wouldn't say it was a 70% chance. This game scares me like it does every single year.
quote:
The point is -- if these teams were evenly matched or if a person were canny enough to say -- this advantage will overbear the other team's advantage -- that is make a judgement much as in War where factors of time, distance, morale, supply, and many intangibles had to be weighed against the chance of success - Only THEN would a "sig bet" be something to pursue.
It isn't that serious.
Posted on 10/14/16 at 10:55 pm to WhiskeyPapa
quote:
Surely this sig bet is weighted 70-30 Bammer?
Bammer should win. None of the people who post here will have an effect on the outcome.
So the Bammers are hardly showing a lot of stones by taking the bet.
Then they show themselves as immature dicks by trying to bait the Tennessee fans into taking the bet. The Vol fans take the bet to show they believe, not that the Vols will or can win, but just to show their loyalty to the Volunteers.
The point is -- if these teams were evenly matched or if a person were canny enough to say -- this advantage will overbear the other team's advantage -- that is make a judgement much as in War where factors of time, distance, morale, supply, and many intangibles had to be weighed against the chance of success - Only THEN would a "sig bet" be something to pursue.
It doesn't take much nerve to pick Bammer in this game, or any of its games.
And only a mouth breathing bunch of Gumps would miss that point.
Oh wait, it's "just for fun."
You can post here and say anything you want, responsibility free. Got it.
Walt
UT '81
Are you serious with that shite? Do you yell at children when their ball goes over your fence.
And why do you intentional type out Walt UT '81 in every post?
Posted on 10/14/16 at 10:55 pm to WhiskeyPapa
I'll perma ban bet you right now that Alabama will not lose to Tennessee this season. That includes tomorrow and a potential SEC CG Rematch.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News