Started By
Message

re: Ish Witter

Posted on 9/20/16 at 9:52 am to
Posted by Stlox
Maryland Heights, MO
Member since Jul 2013
795 posts
Posted on 9/20/16 at 9:52 am to
Trust seems to vary among the coaches.

Witter is getting the ball because Crockett still needs to prove he won't fumble. Strong still needs to prove he knows the playbook and block. That's the story on RBs.

But as for the WRs, that's not the case.
Moore fumbles and drops balls, and Black continues with the mental mistakes.

So which is it? Should we give Crockett and Strong PT? Or bench Moore and Black?

This post was edited on 9/20/16 at 9:54 am
Posted by Tackle74
Columbia, MO
Member since Mar 2012
5264 posts
Posted on 9/20/16 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Or bench Moore and Black?


Moore does not need benched just needs to quit being Lock's primary target all the fricking time. When he spreads the ball around we look really good. How many mental mistakes has Black made? I remember the illegal man downfield vs UGA but draw a blank on others?
Posted by mizslu314
Dirty STL
Member since Sep 2013
15987 posts
Posted on 9/20/16 at 10:01 am to
Minor theory. On paper our best team should be next year. It seems like coaching staff if prepping ish for a big year next year. same case with what were seeing with the Chris Black scenario
Posted by JesusQuintana
St Louis
Member since Oct 2013
33366 posts
Posted on 9/20/16 at 10:52 am to
Moore hasn't had any drop issues since the first game. In fact, that first long TD catch was a great grab because the ball was well behind him.
Posted by IlliniBuck
Member since Apr 2015
189 posts
Posted on 9/20/16 at 12:00 pm to
The trust issue must be big with the coaches. David Morrison said in his column on RockM that Witter was on the field for 61 plays, Crockett for 12, and Strong for 0.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter