Started By
Message
re: Chubb vs Fournette 2016
Posted on 7/24/16 at 2:03 pm to Rickdaddy4188
Posted on 7/24/16 at 2:03 pm to Rickdaddy4188
I supported my argument with stats from auburn, Ohio state, and uf, so I don't think they are outliers. If we look into Oregon and ga tech, I bet they would support my point further, that Multiple good running threats helps rbs out. How can you claim a rb won't be better off with less focus on him?
This post was edited on 7/24/16 at 2:04 pm
2
Posted on 7/24/16 at 2:12 pm to djsdawg
The only time a defense potentially takes eyes off a running back is in 3rd and very long.
All this othe scheme talk is horseshite, the only exception being when 3 rbs in backfield.
All this othe scheme talk is horseshite, the only exception being when 3 rbs in backfield.
Posted on 7/24/16 at 2:38 pm to djsdawg
quote:
supported my argument with stats from auburn, Ohio state, and uf, so I don't think they are outliers. If we look into Oregon and ga tech, I bet they would support my point further, that Multiple good running threats helps rbs out. How can you claim a rb won't be better off with less focus on him?
K. The only person that cant see this is you. You used two different ways to rank UGA backs so it would paint the UGA back in better light. You either cant see this or dont want too. You clearly need to brush up on what an outlier is.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News