Started By
Message

re: Monroe PD responds to Saban

Posted on 7/13/16 at 11:48 pm to
Posted by secuniversity
Member since May 2015
5694 posts
Posted on 7/13/16 at 11:48 pm to
1. When did Saban say they were LSU fans? I don't care about someone's interpretation of what they thought Saban insinuated. What were his actual words?

2. Lack of evidence. Illegal search. No charges. No laws broken.

3. Monroe PD responding to someone's interpretation of what they thought Saban insinuated continues to display unprofessionalism that began with an illegal search by his dept. in the first place.
This post was edited on 7/13/16 at 11:48 pm
Posted by lsufball19
Franklin, TN
Member since Sep 2008
65489 posts
Posted on 7/13/16 at 11:56 pm to
quote:

Lack of evidence. Illegal search. No charges. No laws broken.

Eh, an illegal search doesn't mean laws weren't broken. It means the cops screwed themselves and made the evidence of the laws broken inadmissible. what they actually did was still against the law and they're very fortunate to have had these charges dismissed.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
44279 posts
Posted on 7/14/16 at 7:17 am to
quote:

1. When did Saban say they were LSU fans? I don't care about someone's interpretation of what they thought Saban insinuated. What were his actual words?


This is why it was such a genius move by Saban. Tell Finebaum in "private" knowing he wouldn't be able to keep quit for more than 10 minutes. Now, Saban has plausible deniability and his worshippers will still eat it up.

Pure genius.


quote:

2. Lack of evidence. Illegal search. No charges. No laws broken


Lack of evidence. Illegal search. No charges.
=/=
No laws broken

It's an infringement on rights provided under the constitution. It does not mean there were no laws were broken.

Saying "no laws were broken" because of an illegal search makes one look dumb.


quote:

3. Monroe PD responding to someone's interpretation of what they thought Saban insinuated continues to display unprofessionalism that began with an illegal search by his dept. in the first place.




No it doesn't. If they never issued a response denying the allegations all you same asshats would be saying, "They aren't even denying it so there's obviously some truth".

ETA: Now, if you want to discuss the nature of the response being unprofessional, you have a point. However, to say replying in any way is unprofessional is utter nonsense.
This post was edited on 7/14/16 at 7:26 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter