Ole Miss isn't refuting it because it has nothing to do with them as they stated in the NOA. It didn't make a case for them not being responsible there attorneys stated it as a fact. But again I'm sure you are much more informed in the NCAA process then Ole Miss's attorney.

Look at the NCAA final decision when they broke down the infraction of Rule 19.2.3 it never once address that ULL had any responsibility it only address Saunders did and in great detail. You can keep ignoring the facts all you want.

Those violations against Saunders and Vaughn 100% will not be thrown out in any way. Just like Saunders violation with ULL wasn't thrown out he was hammered for it and they will get hit for those two violations. Just Ole Miss won't because they are not responsible or tied to those infractions. It was all Saunders and Vaughn on there own with out any connection to Ole Miss. schools are responsible for booster and coaches because they are considered part of the University. Ole Miss has not refuted them because they are not invoked in those violations. Or are you saying a school can be punished for an infraction that a coach commits after they are fired and 100% not associated with the school? Just provide a source to that. Just show where the NCAA states that a University is responsible for a fired coach lying? Just give one source for that. It is 100% violation for the coach yes but not the school.