quote:
Reference my other post showing the actual per game numbers for returning players in regards to sacks, TFL, ints and passes defended. They are almost identical.

quote:
What does all those great numbers in '15 mean for '16 considering that most of the bama players that did the heavy lifting are no longer in the program.

Truly retarded. Especially when most, if not all, of those numbers still favor Alabama.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by 167back

Dos Gris

Member since Jun 2012

4711 posts

Posted on 6/26/16 at 12:32 am to JuiceTerry

Right because 2.5 sacks per game is so much more than 2.25 a game. What that comes out to three more sacks over a 12 game schedule?

same thing with TFL. 4.0 VS 3.8.

LSU does lead in passes defended returning 3.3 per game to 2.9 for bama. tide pass defense numbers could be a little lower though due to a couple of DBs that saw action last year transferring out.

My guess is that the bama "D" had a lot more chances for sacks and passes defended. Actually they had almost 100 more.

Considering one is the goat "D" and the other a bunch of weak arse defenders that couldn't stop anybody. At least according to this board.

You would think there would be a greater difference in the numbers. I forgot this isn't about the whole '15 defenses. It's about players returning for '16.

If you want to see a BIG gap in the returning numbers compare starts and total tackles.

1 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board