Started By
Message
re: annoying Clemson
Posted on 6/6/16 at 10:57 am to lsufancy63
Posted on 6/6/16 at 10:57 am to lsufancy63
everybody is aware clemson lost
but that doesn't mean that i can't point out that bama likely loses if kicking team could not catch their own kicked ball (which i see as evidence the kicking team is way too close to the receiving team).
bama shouldn't have been in that title game. that was the epitome of SEC and bama bias. saban had said in prior years that a team that didn't win its division and maybe conference as well shouldn't be in the title game
i would never take any team that lost at home for the playoffs if there were 1 or 2 loss teams available that did not lose at home. home losses should have a greater adverse impact on team's resumes for the playoffs
but that doesn't mean that i can't point out that bama likely loses if kicking team could not catch their own kicked ball (which i see as evidence the kicking team is way too close to the receiving team).
bama shouldn't have been in that title game. that was the epitome of SEC and bama bias. saban had said in prior years that a team that didn't win its division and maybe conference as well shouldn't be in the title game
i would never take any team that lost at home for the playoffs if there were 1 or 2 loss teams available that did not lose at home. home losses should have a greater adverse impact on team's resumes for the playoffs
This post was edited on 6/6/16 at 11:02 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)