Started By
Message

re: Saunders not turned in by olé miss

Posted on 5/28/16 at 6:57 pm to
Posted by Blawdawg
Member since Sep 2012
415 posts
Posted on 5/28/16 at 6:57 pm to
I only skimmed the Saunder's portion of the NOA and response since OM agrees to every allegation made against him and and school on the issue. But, it is all framed as OM had no clue he did that and it was totally rogue. Saunder's was getting "his guys" in and providing "his recruits" benefits. That it was self serving and done behind the head coach's and admin's back. At least that's the party line. The NCAA doesn't dispute it but it's terrible timing for OM given the other level 1 offenses. For just Saunder's they'd get maybe 1/3 of what ULL got. It makes it more likely stuff that Harris did and Kiffin did are classified higher since OM won't get the benefit of the doubt some schools have gotten when stuff was self reported and deemed not worthy of punishment (think Bama and suit gate)

I am 100% sure if the suit thing happened in 2006 and was ferreted out by the NCAA instead of through a memo from Bama it would have resulted in a NOA and another post season ban.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53532 posts
Posted on 5/28/16 at 7:37 pm to
Lol... nope. Then explain another coach on the staff doing the same thing... Vaughn.

So when you look at ULL and suggest that olé miss will only get 1/3rd of what ULL got, you are not taking into account that there was another coach doing the same thing.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter