The UNC stuff has been going on for years with no punishment. I think the OM situation in complicated since the Tunsil Draft stuff happened after the NOA was sent to Ole Miss. Just guessing, but I think this drags out for a while. I'd be surprised if a final resolution is in place before the 2017 season starts.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by Aggie Fishfinder

Republic of Texas

Member since Feb 2012

4260 posts

Posted on 5/23/16 at 10:18 am to DeltaDoc

quote:
I'd be surprised if a final resolution is in place before the 2017 season starts.

This is why I have a hard time seeing OM with another Top 10 class. The negative recruiting against them is going to be strong. Every recruit that is looking at OM is going to be told from multiple coaches that OM could be facing bowl bans in the future.

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by fillmoregandt

OTM

Member since Nov 2009

14368 posts

Posted on 5/23/16 at 10:18 am to DeltaDoc

UNC was way more complicated that OM. UNC was making fake classes for athletes over a span of almost 20 yrs. OM basically revolves around recruitment issues of a handful of players. Apples and oranges. OM won't drag out nearly as long as UNC

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by TampaReb

Member since Aug 2015

1823 posts

Posted on 5/23/16 at 10:22 am to DeltaDoc

If your going to use the UNC case ok it's a great example. With UNC they issued the NOA and then new infractions came to light so they stopped the NOA process and now UNC is responding to the NOA. So based on this the NCAA has found nothing new.

Look at the Miami news paper that states the NCAA was told by Miller about the western union and Tunsil's attorney stated those text were delt with.

I'm sure the NCAA are double checking everything but going off how they handled past cases of if there was anything new the NOA process would be halted.

This post was edited on 5/23/16 at 10:25 am

0 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board