re: Ranking SEC staffs on coaching and Recruiting abilities

quote:

---

LSU should be a C+/A-, UGA Incomplete/A, and MSU B+/C-. Mizzou should get an Incomplete/C- and USCe should get a F-/C

---

How can you have uga ahead of LSU in recruiting already? Just bc your ex DC is coaching there now? Saban has been having # 1 classes since 2000 at LSU, well before Kirby, and will continue to post Kirby. I think you should pump the brakes

And A- lol? I can understand not giving an A+ if you only want to give that to one or two teams out of 120+, but if you look at classes over the last 5 or so years LSU has averaged a higher class than all but 3 schools I believe (Bama, OSU, FSU).

If our staff isn't at least second highest teir possible (A) I don't get your grading scale. I think there is more of an argument for an A+ than an A-

Edit: if you want to go as conservative as possible:
UA______A+
OSU_____A+
FSU_____A
LSU_____A
UM______A-(trending ^)
OM_____$A-
AU______A-
UTk_____ A-
ND______B+
CU______B+
UF______B+ (Until we see more)
UGA_____B+ (TBD)
USCw____B+ (TBD)
UTa______B+\-
UCLA_____B-
And so on...

In all honesty though right now it feels like Bama = A++, then the current big 3 after OSU/FSU/LSU = A+, with Michigan trying squeeze in with them