Started By
Message

re: Why does South Carolina historically suck so bad in the big two sports?

Posted on 5/2/16 at 11:17 pm to
Posted by scrooster
Resident Ethicist
Member since Jul 2012
37716 posts
Posted on 5/2/16 at 11:17 pm to
quote:

Inb4 we have no conference titles because we were an independent.


Wellllllllll, come to think of it ... there is that. I mean 1972-1992 we were Independent - BTW, how many conference titles did any of the other Independents have during their Independent years?
Posted by theGarnetWay
Washington, D.C.
Member since Mar 2010
25877 posts
Posted on 5/2/16 at 11:33 pm to

quote:



Wellllllllll, come to think of it ... there is that. I mean 1972-1992 we were Independent - BTW, how many conference titles did any of the other Independents have during their Independent years?


Not just those 20 years. Roughly half of our football history was as an independent so whatever.

When was Mizzou's lsat conference title in football though? Wasn't it the same year as ours?

quote:

It's also pretty embarrassing to lose to an FCS school.


I find the Mizzou loss more embarrassing TBH.
This post was edited on 5/2/16 at 11:35 pm
Posted by I-59 Tiger
Vestavia Hills, AL
Member since Sep 2003
36703 posts
Posted on 5/3/16 at 9:01 am to
quote:

I mean 1972-1992 we were Independent


South Carolina was in the Metro Conference from 1983 to 1992. A pretty good basketball league.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter