Started By
Message

re: Pete Carroll ~VS~ Nick Saban

Posted on 4/26/16 at 9:01 am to
Posted by Dr Rosenrosen
Member since May 2006
3374 posts
Posted on 4/26/16 at 9:01 am to
The BCS was not an undisputed title. Not even close.

And again I agree that Bama's run is superior to USC's.
This post was edited on 4/26/16 at 9:02 am
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86612 posts
Posted on 4/26/16 at 9:04 am to
quote:

The BCS was not an undisputed title. Not even close.


Uh, yeah it is, unless you think the playoff isn't undisputed either.

Everyone in the country agreed to abide by the BCS system wherein #1 and #2 at the end of the season woudl play each other for the national title. That was the rules. There were many ingredients to make the BCS pie (coaches poll, AP poll, a series of computer formulas) but the end result was matchign 1 vs 2. The AP made up 33% of the BCS formula (even less if you assign a consistent value to each of the computers).

USC won 1 national title, and it was in 2004.
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
26999 posts
Posted on 4/26/16 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

The BCS was not an undisputed title. Not even close.


Arguments like this are utterly absurd. You may not have liked the BCS...so what. The fact is that every single one of the 128 teams in the football bowl subdivison were members of the BCS and by virtue of their membership agreed to be a part of the system that chose to crown its champion in that way. Every. Single. Team
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter