Started By
Message

re: Comparing the 2001 schedule to 2016

Posted on 4/11/16 at 5:58 pm to
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86553 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 5:58 pm to
Yeah I considered 06 AU as well. We may not remember them as being good becuase we had our way with them but they got as high as #2 that season, ended up beating a #2 ranked and eventual national champ florida, and if they had beaten us it's possible that they're playing for a NC berth against UF in the SECCG.

But yeah the others you mentioned are up there. 2004 LSU was pretty good, aside from the beatdown we administered their 2 other losses that year were by 1 to national champ auburn and by 5 in the bowl game on a freak hail mary. 09 Tech would have made a case if not for their collapse down the stretch.

they don't belong at the top of the list, but I think 02 alabama is pretty underrated, maybe due to their postseason ban. Their 3 losses were to us by 2, @#2 Oklahoma by 10, and by 10 to auburn. 14 Clemson was solid other than us beating them down, other losses were in OT to #1 FSU and a head scratcher to tech.
This post was edited on 4/11/16 at 6:00 pm
Posted by VADawg
Wherever
Member since Nov 2011
45060 posts
Posted on 4/11/16 at 6:05 pm to
quote:


they don't belong at the top of the list, but I think 02 alabama is pretty underrated, maybe due to their postseason ban


That was a very good team. If they weren't banned, they would have been really tough to beat again in Atlanta.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter