Started By
Message
re: (takes off SEC goggles for two seconds) Satellite Camps, what's the big deal???
Posted on 4/8/16 at 2:16 pm to mwade91383
Posted on 4/8/16 at 2:16 pm to mwade91383
School A is rich: Can afford to set up camps in all 50 states.
School B is not rich: Can't afford to set up any camps.
NCAA says no, that does not help competitiveness.
ETA: Yes, I downvoted. You basically asked for it.
School B is not rich: Can't afford to set up any camps.
NCAA says no, that does not help competitiveness.
ETA: Yes, I downvoted. You basically asked for it.
This post was edited on 4/8/16 at 2:17 pm
2
Posted on 4/8/16 at 2:20 pm to roadGator
Since when do they care about a school's resources? Why is this the advantage they won't let teams exploit?
Separate issue but same rule, this also really hurts MAC schools. Many of those guys flock to OSU campus to recruit. Sure they won't get the top guys but there's tons of guys who can play at the next step down. So how does this rule help the little guys????
Thanks your honesty, downvote away!
Separate issue but same rule, this also really hurts MAC schools. Many of those guys flock to OSU campus to recruit. Sure they won't get the top guys but there's tons of guys who can play at the next step down. So how does this rule help the little guys????
Thanks your honesty, downvote away!
Posted on 4/8/16 at 2:22 pm to roadGator
quote:
School A is rich: Can afford to set up camps in all 50 states.
School B is not rich: Can't afford to set up any camps.
NCAA says no, that does not help competitiveness.
Pretty much sums it up. The football arms race is out of hand as it is. Now teams (or, more accurately, a team) are having satellite camps and road trips for spring training. What next? An 'exhibition' game against another team at the end of spring?
The NCAA (correctly, IMO) recognized that this is a path they really didn't want to go down.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News