Started By
Message
re: The SEC should of chosen Nebraska not Missouri
Posted on 4/6/16 at 11:51 pm to kilo
Posted on 4/6/16 at 11:51 pm to kilo
The 2013 Mizzou team was impressive but during the heyday of the East in the 90's and early 2000's Do you really believe you would have won the division
Admit that coming in while UGA, UF and UT were down helped out a lot
Admit that coming in while UGA, UF and UT were down helped out a lot
1
Posted on 4/6/16 at 11:58 pm to TheRealTigah
Lets look at the facts:
SEC East ranked teams per year(final national rankings):
1992: 8,10,12
1993: 5,12
1994: 7,22
1995: 2,3
1996: 1,9
1997: 4,10,7
1998: 1,5,14
1999: 12,9,16
2000: 10,19,20
2001: 4,3,13,22
2002: 3
2003: 7,15,24
2004: 13,7
2005: 10,12
2006: 1,25,23
2007: 2,12,13
2008: 1,13
2009: 3
2010: 22
2011: 9,19
2012: 5,9,8,23
2013: 5,4,24
SEC East ranked teams per year(final national rankings):
1992: 8,10,12
1993: 5,12
1994: 7,22
1995: 2,3
1996: 1,9
1997: 4,10,7
1998: 1,5,14
1999: 12,9,16
2000: 10,19,20
2001: 4,3,13,22
2002: 3
2003: 7,15,24
2004: 13,7
2005: 10,12
2006: 1,25,23
2007: 2,12,13
2008: 1,13
2009: 3
2010: 22
2011: 9,19
2012: 5,9,8,23
2013: 5,4,24
This post was edited on 4/7/16 at 12:00 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News